Maroti @ Manish Indrapalji Hole @ Manish ... vs State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Nandanwan Nagpur ... (2024)

Bombay High Court

Maroti @ Manish Indrapalji Hole @ Manish ... vs State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Nandanwan Nagpur ... on 3 April, 2024

 1 apeal801.23.J.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.801 OF 2023 Maroti s/o Indrapalji Hole @ Manish Selure Age: 39 yrs, Occ :- Business, R/o. Near Datta Mandir, Aroli, Tah. Mouda, Dist:- Nagpur. ....... APPELLANT APPLICANT ...V E R S U S...1. State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Nandanwan, Nagpur.2. Victim XYZ in Crime No.230/2023 through P.S.O. Nandanwan, Nagpur. ....... RESPONDENT NON-APPLICANT-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. A. G. Hunge, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. M. J. Khan, APP for Respondent No.1/State. Mr. Sachin Katarpawar, Advocate for Respondent No.2.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM: URMILA JOSHI PHALKE, J. DATE: 3rd APRIL, 2024.ORAL JUDGMENT:

Heard.

2. Admit.

3. By preferring this appeal the appellant has challenged

the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-10 and Special 2 apeal801.23.J.odt

Judge under Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of

Atrocities) Act, Nagpur by which the Special Court has rejected the

bail application of the present appellant in Criminal Bail

Application No.1813/2023.

4. As per the accusation the victim who is residing with

her maternal uncle and mother as she was destitute by her

husband prior to ten years and while she went to Aroli to attend

the marriage of son of uncle, he got acquaintance with the present

applicant. It is further alleged that present applicant contacted her

and called her at Kanhan and took her in one lodge and subjected

her for sexual assault on the promise of marriage. Thereafter on

several occasion the act of sexual was repeated by the present

applicant due to which she was pregnant and delivered a child.

On the basis of said report police have registered the crime against

the present appellant.

5. After registration of the crime the present appellant

approached to the Special Court for grant of bail by filing an

application bearing Criminal Bail Application No.1813/2023.

The Special Court considered the entire investigation papers and

observed that the statement of the victim and another evidence 3 apeal801.23.J.odt

collected during the investigation makes out a prima facie case

against the present appellant and rejected the bail application.

6. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the same

present appeal is preferred by the appellant for grant of bail on the

ground that the learned trial court has not considered that the

victim is grown up lady and the relationship between the present

applicant and the victim was consensual. Now investigation is

already completed charge-sheet is already filed the further

incarceration of the present applicant is not required. In view of

that, the appellant requires to be released on bail.

7. The learned APP strongly opposed the said application

on the ground that victim is not only subjected for sexual assault

on the promise of marriage but the applicant has also threatened

her that he would defame her. Moreover, the applicant has

suppressed the fact that he is a married person and on the promise

of marriage subjected her for sexual assault. If he is released on

bail he would tamper with the prosecution evidence. The learned

counsel for the victim reiterated the said contention and pressed

for rejection of the appeal.

4 apeal801.23.J.odt

8. After hearing the learned counsel for the appellant

and the learned APP for the State, perused the investigation papers

the crime is registered on the basis of report lodged by the victim

who is 30 years old. As per her statement, she got acquaintance

with the present applicant in one marriage of her relative,

thereafter there was a communication between them. The present

applicant had called her at Kanhan and booked lodge and there

was physical relationship between them. It is alleged that the

appellant has promised for marriage. Admittedly, whether there

was false promise of marriage or it is the breach of promise is a

matter of evidence. At this stage, the investigation is completed,

charge-sheet is already filed. The DNA report is yet to be received.

Considering the fact that there was love affair between the victim

and the present appellant and out of that the physical relationship

was there, victim is a grown up lady who had consented from

sexual assault whether that consent was under the special or is

matter on evidence. At this stage, further incarceration of the

present appellant is not required. However, considering the

apprehension raised by the learned counsel of the respondent

which can be taken care of by imposing certain conditions on the

appellant. The learned trial court has not considered the fact that

there was a love affair and out of love affair the sexual relationship 5 apeal801.23.J.odt

was there. Considering the same the order passed by the learned

Special Court requires to be set aside. The order passed by the

learned Special Court is quashed and set aside. In view of that, I

proceed to pass following order:

 i) The appeal is allowed. ii) The appellant - Maroti s/o Indrapalji Hole @

Manish Selure shall be released on bail in

connection with Crime No.230/2023 registered

for the offence punishable under Sections

376(2)(n), 417 and 506 of the Indian Penal

Code read with Section 3(2)(v)(a), 3(2)(v),

3(i)(w)(i)(ii) of the Prevention of Scheduled

Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of

Atrocities) Act, on executing P.R. bond in the

sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of like

amount.

iii) The appellant shall not in manner contact the

victim and shall not induce, threat or promise

any witnesses who are acquainted with the

facts of the present case.

6 apeal801.23.J.odt

iv) The appellant shall not enter into the vicinity

i.e. Nandanwan slum area till culmination of

the trial.

v) The appellant shall attend the dates of

proceedings before the trial Court without

seeking any exemption unless there are

exceptional circ*mstances.

9. The appeal is disposed of.

JUDGE

NSN

Signed by: Mr. N.S. NikhareDesignation: PA To Honourable JudgeDate: 05/04/2024 10:34:10

Maroti @ Manish Indrapalji Hole @ Manish ... vs State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Nandanwan Nagpur ... (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Ray Christiansen

Last Updated:

Views: 6025

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (69 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Ray Christiansen

Birthday: 1998-05-04

Address: Apt. 814 34339 Sauer Islands, Hirtheville, GA 02446-8771

Phone: +337636892828

Job: Lead Hospitality Designer

Hobby: Urban exploration, Tai chi, Lockpicking, Fashion, Gunsmithing, Pottery, Geocaching

Introduction: My name is Ray Christiansen, I am a fair, good, cute, gentle, vast, glamorous, excited person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.